<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 31 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400276</link>
    <description>An appellant seeking to withdraw an affidavit of valuation and restrict court fee to a fixed amount was refused where the civil appeals, in substance, challenged an order that confirmed monetary demands, interest and reversal of credit. On that footing, the affidavit of valuation was properly filed because the impugned order imposed a financial liability, and there was no legal basis to permit withdrawal merely on the characterisation of the appeal as being against the Registrar&#039;s order. The request to withdraw the affidavit of valuation was rejected, and the appeal against the Registrar&#039;s order was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2020 14:47:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=626723" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 31 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400276</link>
      <description>An appellant seeking to withdraw an affidavit of valuation and restrict court fee to a fixed amount was refused where the civil appeals, in substance, challenged an order that confirmed monetary demands, interest and reversal of credit. On that footing, the affidavit of valuation was properly filed because the impugned order imposed a financial liability, and there was no legal basis to permit withdrawal merely on the characterisation of the appeal as being against the Registrar&#039;s order. The request to withdraw the affidavit of valuation was rejected, and the appeal against the Registrar&#039;s order was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400276</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>