<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 30 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400275</link>
    <description>Regular bail under Section 439 CrPC was granted in a matter involving rival allegations and counter-allegations. The Court noted that the reply to the Section 138 NI Act notice and the applicant&#039;s own complaint raised factual matters that could be examined at trial, and those circumstances justified exercise of discretion in the applicant&#039;s favour. Bail was therefore granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2020 16:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=626722" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 30 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400275</link>
      <description>Regular bail under Section 439 CrPC was granted in a matter involving rival allegations and counter-allegations. The Court noted that the reply to the Section 138 NI Act notice and the applicant&#039;s own complaint raised factual matters that could be examined at trial, and those circumstances justified exercise of discretion in the applicant&#039;s favour. Bail was therefore granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400275</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>