<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 22 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400267</link>
    <description>The Court decided not to restore the writ petition seeking the return of a Bank Guarantee as the relief sought was deemed consequential. The Court directed the Registry to return the Bank Guarantee to the petitioner, considering that the purpose for which it was submitted had been fulfilled under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme 2019. The Interim Application was disposed of with this direction, resolving the matter in favor of the applicant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2020 14:47:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=626711" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 22 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400267</link>
      <description>The Court decided not to restore the writ petition seeking the return of a Bank Guarantee as the relief sought was deemed consequential. The Court directed the Registry to return the Bank Guarantee to the petitioner, considering that the purpose for which it was submitted had been fulfilled under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme 2019. The Interim Application was disposed of with this direction, resolving the matter in favor of the applicant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400267</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>