<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 4 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400249</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals against penalty orders for A.Y 2010-11 and A.Y 2011-12, stating that penalties cannot be imposed on estimated income where additions were sustained on an estimated basis. Emphasizing natural justice principles, the Tribunal directed the deletion of penalties, stressing procedural fairness and consistency in penalty imposition based on estimated income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2020 14:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=626687" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 4 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400249</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals against penalty orders for A.Y 2010-11 and A.Y 2011-12, stating that penalties cannot be imposed on estimated income where additions were sustained on an estimated basis. Emphasizing natural justice principles, the Tribunal directed the deletion of penalties, stressing procedural fairness and consistency in penalty imposition based on estimated income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400249</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>