<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 1418 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291203</link>
    <description>Refund of service tax under Notification No. 41/2007-S.T. could not be denied merely because each invoice was not separately certified by a Chartered Accountant. The Tribunal treated the certification requirement as evidentiary, intended to confirm that the services were used for exports and paid for by the assessee. A consolidated certificate containing invoice-wise details was held to be sufficient compliance, and the objection that individual certification was mandatory was rejected. The assessee was therefore entitled to the refund.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2020 19:22:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=626673" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 1418 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291203</link>
      <description>Refund of service tax under Notification No. 41/2007-S.T. could not be denied merely because each invoice was not separately certified by a Chartered Accountant. The Tribunal treated the certification requirement as evidentiary, intended to confirm that the services were used for exports and paid for by the assessee. A consolidated certificate containing invoice-wise details was held to be sufficient compliance, and the objection that individual certification was mandatory was rejected. The assessee was therefore entitled to the refund.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291203</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>