<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1854 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291197</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the Union of India&#039;s application seeking a moratorium under Section 242 of the Companies Act, 2013, for R1 Company and its group companies. The Tribunal clarified that the Companies Act, 2013, does not provide for a moratorium like the provisions under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. Consequently, the application for a moratorium was denied in CP 3638/2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2020 19:17:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=626669" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1854 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291197</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the Union of India&#039;s application seeking a moratorium under Section 242 of the Companies Act, 2013, for R1 Company and its group companies. The Tribunal clarified that the Companies Act, 2013, does not provide for a moratorium like the provisions under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. Consequently, the application for a moratorium was denied in CP 3638/2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291197</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>