<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 1417 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291191</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the refund to be granted. It emphasized that the application for refund was within the time limit as the relevant date for reckoning had not started due to the unutilized deposit. The decision highlighted the comprehensive application of Section 11B to refund claims involving deposits not utilized for duty payments, ensuring a fair interpretation of the law in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2020 16:57:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=626663" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 1417 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291191</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the refund to be granted. It emphasized that the application for refund was within the time limit as the relevant date for reckoning had not started due to the unutilized deposit. The decision highlighted the comprehensive application of Section 11B to refund claims involving deposits not utilized for duty payments, ensuring a fair interpretation of the law in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291191</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>