<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 1195 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400221</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, determining that the provision of Rs. 20.05 crores for pay revision arrears was an ascertained liability, not a contingent liability. The Tribunal held that the provision complied with Accounting Standard-4 and was deductible under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee, setting aside the orders of the AO and CIT(A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2020 16:10:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=626626" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 1195 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400221</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, determining that the provision of Rs. 20.05 crores for pay revision arrears was an ascertained liability, not a contingent liability. The Tribunal held that the provision complied with Accounting Standard-4 and was deductible under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee, setting aside the orders of the AO and CIT(A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400221</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>