<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 1191 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400217</link>
    <description>The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal due to a change in management, admitted the additional ground challenging the disallowance under section 40A(3) as purely legal, and deleted the disallowance of cash payments for land purchases under section 40A(3). The Tribunal emphasized the genuineness of the transactions and the business exigencies necessitating cash payments, leading to the favorable outcome for the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2020 10:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=626618" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 1191 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400217</link>
      <description>The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal due to a change in management, admitted the additional ground challenging the disallowance under section 40A(3) as purely legal, and deleted the disallowance of cash payments for land purchases under section 40A(3). The Tribunal emphasized the genuineness of the transactions and the business exigencies necessitating cash payments, leading to the favorable outcome for the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400217</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>