<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 1166 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400192</link>
    <description>The High Court remitted the matter back to the Tribunal for a fresh decision, emphasizing the need for factual accuracy and compliance with the law. All contentions were kept open, and the Tribunal was directed to dispose of the appeal within six months. The High Court did not address the substantial questions of law due to the remittance for reconsideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2020 12:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=626544" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 1166 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400192</link>
      <description>The High Court remitted the matter back to the Tribunal for a fresh decision, emphasizing the need for factual accuracy and compliance with the law. All contentions were kept open, and the Tribunal was directed to dispose of the appeal within six months. The High Court did not address the substantial questions of law due to the remittance for reconsideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400192</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>