<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 1149 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400175</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that penalties under section 271(1)(c) cannot be imposed on estimated income when additions are based on estimates. The decision emphasized the importance of adhering to principles of natural justice and considering the facts of the case before levying penalties on estimated figures. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete the penalty, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and supporting the appellant&#039;s position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2020 10:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=626515" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 1149 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400175</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that penalties under section 271(1)(c) cannot be imposed on estimated income when additions are based on estimates. The decision emphasized the importance of adhering to principles of natural justice and considering the facts of the case before levying penalties on estimated figures. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete the penalty, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and supporting the appellant&#039;s position.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400175</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>