<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 1144 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400170</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the reopening of the assessment based on third-party satisfaction but found the disallowance of expenses for bogus purchases of packing materials unjustified. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting the additions made by the Assessing Officer and upholding the genuineness of the purchases. The appeals were partly allowed for the assessment years 2009-10 and 2010-11 and fully allowed for the assessment year 2011-12.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2020 10:48:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=626509" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 1144 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400170</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the reopening of the assessment based on third-party satisfaction but found the disallowance of expenses for bogus purchases of packing materials unjustified. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting the additions made by the Assessing Officer and upholding the genuineness of the purchases. The appeals were partly allowed for the assessment years 2009-10 and 2010-11 and fully allowed for the assessment year 2011-12.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400170</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>