<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 1143 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400169</link>
    <description>The ITAT concluded that the reopening of assessments for A.Y. 2010-11 and A.Y. 2013-14 under section 147 was invalid due to the absence of disallowance u/s 14A in the stated reasons. The Tribunal applied the precedent from Jet Airways Ltd., setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and deleting the disallowance. Consequently, the appeals were partly allowed, and other grounds were not addressed. The decision was pronounced on 30.09.2020, following delays due to the COVID-19 lockdown.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 11:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=626507" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 1143 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400169</link>
      <description>The ITAT concluded that the reopening of assessments for A.Y. 2010-11 and A.Y. 2013-14 under section 147 was invalid due to the absence of disallowance u/s 14A in the stated reasons. The Tribunal applied the precedent from Jet Airways Ltd., setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and deleting the disallowance. Consequently, the appeals were partly allowed, and other grounds were not addressed. The decision was pronounced on 30.09.2020, following delays due to the COVID-19 lockdown.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400169</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>