<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 1142 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400168</link>
    <description>The Court set aside the original order due to procedural irregularities, directing a fresh hearing and a speaking order within two weeks. The status quo was maintained for the goods, and no opinion on the merits was expressed. The writ petition was disposed of without costs, and the interim application was also resolved accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 May 2021 10:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=626505" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 1142 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400168</link>
      <description>The Court set aside the original order due to procedural irregularities, directing a fresh hearing and a speaking order within two weeks. The status quo was maintained for the goods, and no opinion on the merits was expressed. The writ petition was disposed of without costs, and the interim application was also resolved accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400168</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>