<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 1139 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400165</link>
    <description>The Karnataka HC noted that Board instructions prescribing monetary limits for departmental appeals applied separately to Customs matters and that the later instruction dated 22.08.2019 was confined to legacy Central Excise and Service Tax issues. The earlier monetary-limit instruction therefore continued to govern Customs appeals. As the disputed amount fell below the prescribed threshold, the revenue&#039;s appeal was not maintainable and was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2020 10:16:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=626499" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 1139 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400165</link>
      <description>The Karnataka HC noted that Board instructions prescribing monetary limits for departmental appeals applied separately to Customs matters and that the later instruction dated 22.08.2019 was confined to legacy Central Excise and Service Tax issues. The earlier monetary-limit instruction therefore continued to govern Customs appeals. As the disputed amount fell below the prescribed threshold, the revenue&#039;s appeal was not maintainable and was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400165</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>