<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 1451 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291157</link>
    <description>The tax case appeal was dismissed as withdrawn at the instance of the Revenue under Circular No. 21 of 2015. The questions of law were expressly left open for decision in appropriate cases. Liberty was granted to the Revenue to revive the appeal within twelve weeks if the withdrawal was inadvertent despite the case falling within the exceptions in paragraph 8 of the Circular.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2020 10:07:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=626478" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 1451 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291157</link>
      <description>The tax case appeal was dismissed as withdrawn at the instance of the Revenue under Circular No. 21 of 2015. The questions of law were expressly left open for decision in appropriate cases. Liberty was granted to the Revenue to revive the appeal within twelve weeks if the withdrawal was inadvertent despite the case falling within the exceptions in paragraph 8 of the Circular.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291157</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>