<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1512 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291141</link>
    <description>The tribunal confirmed the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act as the assessee failed to justify unexplained credit balances, indicating income concealment. Legal precedents and factual findings supported the decision, leading to the dismissal of the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2020 18:55:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=626465" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1512 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291141</link>
      <description>The tribunal confirmed the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act as the assessee failed to justify unexplained credit balances, indicating income concealment. Legal precedents and factual findings supported the decision, leading to the dismissal of the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291141</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>