<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1820 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291151</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand of Service Tax on reimbursed expenses, deeming penalties under Section 78 unwarranted, and finding no suppression of facts. The appeal was allowed with consequential benefits, overturning the impugned order confirming the tax demand and penalties imposed under the Finance Act, 1994.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2020 18:55:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=626459" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1820 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291151</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand of Service Tax on reimbursed expenses, deeming penalties under Section 78 unwarranted, and finding no suppression of facts. The appeal was allowed with consequential benefits, overturning the impugned order confirming the tax demand and penalties imposed under the Finance Act, 1994.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291151</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>