<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 1297 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291139</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the limited company appellant, holding that the loan amount received from a group concern with common shareholders did not constitute deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal emphasized that deemed dividend can only apply to shareholders and not to the company itself, distinguishing the case from situations involving partnership firms. As a result, the addition made under Section 2(22)(e) was deemed unjustified and was deleted by the Tribunal&#039;s decision on November 7, 2012, in Chennai.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2020 14:27:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=626447" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 1297 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291139</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the limited company appellant, holding that the loan amount received from a group concern with common shareholders did not constitute deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal emphasized that deemed dividend can only apply to shareholders and not to the company itself, distinguishing the case from situations involving partnership firms. As a result, the addition made under Section 2(22)(e) was deemed unjustified and was deleted by the Tribunal&#039;s decision on November 7, 2012, in Chennai.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291139</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>