https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400157 Where a statutory application for provisional release of seized perishable goods was already pending under the CGST Act, the writ court declined to examine the legality or validity of the seizure and prohibition orders at that stage. Instead of directing release itself, it required the competent authority to consider the provisional release request in accordance with law and to pass an appropriate order within one week, recognising the urgency created by the perishable nature of the goods. The substantive validity of the seizure remained open. en-us Tue, 27 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Mar 2025 10:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400157 Where a statutory application for provisional release of seized perishable goods was already pending under the CGST Act, the writ court declined to examine the legality or validity of the seizure and prohibition orders at that stage. Instead of directing release itself, it required the competent authority to consider the provisional release request in accordance with law and to pass an appropriate order within one week, recognising the urgency created by the perishable nature of the goods. The substantive validity of the seizure remained open. Case-Laws GST Tue, 27 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400157