https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400143 The appellant challenged the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's order, alleging perversity in considering certain proceedings not included in the reasons for reopening the assessment. The Tribunal's decision was disputed on the grounds of jurisdiction for reassessment, reopening beyond four years, change of opinion, and the levy of interest u/s.234B. The judgment highlighted the introduction of the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme for resolving tax disputes and directed the appellant to file the necessary form under the Act by a specified date. The appeal was disposed of with liberty for restoration based on the outcome of the declaration filed under the Act. en-us Tue, 13 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Oct 2020 20:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400143 The appellant challenged the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's order, alleging perversity in considering certain proceedings not included in the reasons for reopening the assessment. The Tribunal's decision was disputed on the grounds of jurisdiction for reassessment, reopening beyond four years, change of opinion, and the levy of interest u/s.234B. The judgment highlighted the introduction of the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme for resolving tax disputes and directed the appellant to file the necessary form under the Act by a specified date. The appeal was disposed of with liberty for restoration based on the outcome of the declaration filed under the Act. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 13 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400143