https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400129 In an appeal against acquittal, the appellate court may reappreciate evidence and interfere where the trial court's view is perverse or rests on inadmissible material; the reversal of acquittal was upheld. A prosecution document cannot be used against a party unless the witness is confronted with it in cross-examination; reliance on the bail-reply document was therefore impermissible. The case was not vitiated by partial support from independent witnesses because reliable police evidence and corroborative recovery evidence remained sufficient. The sentence was left undisturbed because it was already lenient in light of the applicable statutory minimum and the total mixture weight relevant to sentencing. en-us Mon, 26 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Oct 2020 09:26:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400129 In an appeal against acquittal, the appellate court may reappreciate evidence and interfere where the trial court's view is perverse or rests on inadmissible material; the reversal of acquittal was upheld. A prosecution document cannot be used against a party unless the witness is confronted with it in cross-examination; reliance on the bail-reply document was therefore impermissible. The case was not vitiated by partial support from independent witnesses because reliable police evidence and corroborative recovery evidence remained sufficient. The sentence was left undisturbed because it was already lenient in light of the applicable statutory minimum and the total mixture weight relevant to sentencing. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 26 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400129