<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1351 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291132</link>
    <description>The tribunal addressed multiple disallowances made by the AO, with some upheld and others deleted. The disallowance of wages expense was partly confirmed, disallowance of site expenses was deleted, disallowance of super structure cost was upheld, disallowance of lease rent was confirmed, and disallowance of letout property cost amortization was rejected. The tribunal allowed the appeal partly, with interest u/s 234D deemed consequential.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2020 20:31:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=626391" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1351 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291132</link>
      <description>The tribunal addressed multiple disallowances made by the AO, with some upheld and others deleted. The disallowance of wages expense was partly confirmed, disallowance of site expenses was deleted, disallowance of super structure cost was upheld, disallowance of lease rent was confirmed, and disallowance of letout property cost amortization was rejected. The tribunal allowed the appeal partly, with interest u/s 234D deemed consequential.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291132</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>