<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 1535 - CESTAT  AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291116</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the State Transport Corporation, holding that renting buses to ONGC for staff transportation did not amount to providing a Rent-a-Cab service, based on the precedent set by the Supreme Court in a similar case. The demand made by the Revenue was set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the State Transport Corporation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2020 19:21:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=626389" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 1535 - CESTAT  AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291116</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the State Transport Corporation, holding that renting buses to ONGC for staff transportation did not amount to providing a Rent-a-Cab service, based on the precedent set by the Supreme Court in a similar case. The demand made by the Revenue was set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the State Transport Corporation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291116</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>