<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 1364 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , HYDERABAD BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291125</link>
    <description>A section 7 application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was admitted because the financial creditor supported the claim with loan documents, bank records, assignment papers, recovery material and evidence of outstanding liability. The corporate debtor did not meaningfully dispute the financial debt or default and repeatedly sought time for settlement, which reinforced the existence of liability and default. As the application was complete and procedural requirements were complied with, the adjudicating authority applied the principle that established default requires admission. The corporate insolvency resolution process was commenced, moratorium followed, and the proposed interim resolution professional was appointed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2020 19:21:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=626379" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 1364 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , HYDERABAD BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291125</link>
      <description>A section 7 application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was admitted because the financial creditor supported the claim with loan documents, bank records, assignment papers, recovery material and evidence of outstanding liability. The corporate debtor did not meaningfully dispute the financial debt or default and repeatedly sought time for settlement, which reinforced the existence of liability and default. As the application was complete and procedural requirements were complied with, the adjudicating authority applied the principle that established default requires admission. The corporate insolvency resolution process was commenced, moratorium followed, and the proposed interim resolution professional was appointed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291125</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>