<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (2) TMI 129 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291105</link>
    <description>A public auction conducted under customs sanction must be read according to the auction list and special conditions, and any exclusions must be confined to those expressly recorded. On that basis, the later refusal to deliver the remaining goods and their seizure as &quot;prime quality&quot; goods were unsupported by the original sale terms. The text also notes that a writ petition may be maintained under Article 226 despite an alternative remedy where unauthorised action by public authorities is alleged, and that disputed factual questions can still be decided on affidavits when the controversy turns mainly on official records and no cross-examination is sought.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2020 15:37:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=626359" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (2) TMI 129 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291105</link>
      <description>A public auction conducted under customs sanction must be read according to the auction list and special conditions, and any exclusions must be confined to those expressly recorded. On that basis, the later refusal to deliver the remaining goods and their seizure as &quot;prime quality&quot; goods were unsupported by the original sale terms. The text also notes that a writ petition may be maintained under Article 226 despite an alternative remedy where unauthorised action by public authorities is alleged, and that disputed factual questions can still be decided on affidavits when the controversy turns mainly on official records and no cross-examination is sought.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291105</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>