https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291102 Section 32(1) of the Indian Evidence Act extends to a deceased person's statement about going to meet a particular person or to a place where death later occurred, if the statement is sufficiently proximate to the transaction resulting in death; on that basis, the widow's evidence was admissible. Section 162 of the Code of Criminal Procedure bars use at trial of a statement made to police during investigation even if the maker later becomes an accused; the accused's statement was therefore inadmissible. After excluding that statement, the remaining circumstantial evidence was still sufficient to support the murder conviction, and no failure of justice was shown. en-us Thu, 19 Jan 1939 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Oct 2020 10:21:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291102 Section 32(1) of the Indian Evidence Act extends to a deceased person's statement about going to meet a particular person or to a place where death later occurred, if the statement is sufficiently proximate to the transaction resulting in death; on that basis, the widow's evidence was admissible. Section 162 of the Code of Criminal Procedure bars use at trial of a statement made to police during investigation even if the maker later becomes an accused; the accused's statement was therefore inadmissible. After excluding that statement, the remaining circumstantial evidence was still sufficient to support the murder conviction, and no failure of justice was shown. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 19 Jan 1939 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291102