<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Respondent Violates CGST Act by Not Passing ITC Benefits to Buyers, NAPA Confirms Price Reduction Failure.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55317</link>
    <description>Profiteering - purchase of flats - allegation of Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) to them by way of commensurate reduction in prices of the flats - contravention of Section 171 (1) of the CGST Act, 2017 proved - NAPA</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2020 10:09:38 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2020 10:09:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=626348" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Respondent Violates CGST Act by Not Passing ITC Benefits to Buyers, NAPA Confirms Price Reduction Failure.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55317</link>
      <description>Profiteering - purchase of flats - allegation of Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) to them by way of commensurate reduction in prices of the flats - contravention of Section 171 (1) of the CGST Act, 2017 proved - NAPA</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2020 10:09:38 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=55317</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>