<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 1094 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400120</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, setting aside the orders of the Tribunal and CIT(A), remanding the matter to the AO for fresh consideration. The Court emphasized the need to assess whether the Assessee&#039;s activities were commercial and instructed the AO to consider legal principles laid down by the Courts and Tribunal. Substantial questions of law were left open, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2020 10:05:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=626343" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 1094 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400120</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, setting aside the orders of the Tribunal and CIT(A), remanding the matter to the AO for fresh consideration. The Court emphasized the need to assess whether the Assessee&#039;s activities were commercial and instructed the AO to consider legal principles laid down by the Courts and Tribunal. Substantial questions of law were left open, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400120</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>