<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 1085 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400111</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing both grounds of appeal related to the disallowance of depreciation claim on motor vehicles and the disallowance claimed under section 80IA(4) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year in question. The Tribunal held that disallowance of depreciation for vehicles purchased in the name of directors was not justified and that the assessee was entitled to the deduction under section 80IA(4) as per legal precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2020 19:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=626331" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 1085 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400111</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing both grounds of appeal related to the disallowance of depreciation claim on motor vehicles and the disallowance claimed under section 80IA(4) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year in question. The Tribunal held that disallowance of depreciation for vehicles purchased in the name of directors was not justified and that the assessee was entitled to the deduction under section 80IA(4) as per legal precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400111</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>