<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 1081 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400107</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to delete the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act, emphasizing the debatable nature of the taxability of interest income. The Tribunal concluded that no concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income occurred, as the assessee disclosed all relevant facts. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, affirming the deletion of the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2020 17:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=626327" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 1081 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400107</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to delete the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act, emphasizing the debatable nature of the taxability of interest income. The Tribunal concluded that no concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income occurred, as the assessee disclosed all relevant facts. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, affirming the deletion of the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400107</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>