<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 1062 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400088</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the gross profit to be as per the conceded rates and upholding the addition made for stock variation. Sales Tax Revisions were allowed, with each party bearing their respective costs. The judgment emphasized the importance of a thorough assessment process, independent evaluation of evidence, and adherence to established legal principles in determining gross profit rates for tax purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2020 09:09:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=626301" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 1062 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400088</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the gross profit to be as per the conceded rates and upholding the addition made for stock variation. Sales Tax Revisions were allowed, with each party bearing their respective costs. The judgment emphasized the importance of a thorough assessment process, independent evaluation of evidence, and adherence to established legal principles in determining gross profit rates for tax purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400088</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>