<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1696 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291089</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the 3rd proviso of Rule 4(1) of Cenvat Credit Rules, effective from 1-9-2014, did not have retrospective application. Consequently, the appellant was allowed to claim the Cenvat credit taken on 20-1-2015 based on the Bill of Entry dated 22-5-2014, resulting in the appeal being allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2020 09:03:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=626285" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1696 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291089</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the 3rd proviso of Rule 4(1) of Cenvat Credit Rules, effective from 1-9-2014, did not have retrospective application. Consequently, the appellant was allowed to claim the Cenvat credit taken on 20-1-2015 based on the Bill of Entry dated 22-5-2014, resulting in the appeal being allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291089</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>