<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 1038 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400064</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the reduction of share capital as proposed by the company under section 66 of the Companies Act, 2013. The reduction involved canceling a specific number of equity shares with a premium per share determined based on a valuation report. The reduction was approved by the Board of Directors and members through a special resolution, and all necessary consents from creditors were obtained. Despite objections from the Income Tax Department, the Tribunal found the Applicant&#039;s responses satisfactory, citing a previous judgment allowing a similar reduction. The order detailed the refund process to shareholders and compliance undertakings, requiring submission to the Registrar of Companies and publication in a designated newspaper.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2020 11:03:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=626237" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 1038 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400064</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the reduction of share capital as proposed by the company under section 66 of the Companies Act, 2013. The reduction involved canceling a specific number of equity shares with a premium per share determined based on a valuation report. The reduction was approved by the Board of Directors and members through a special resolution, and all necessary consents from creditors were obtained. Despite objections from the Income Tax Department, the Tribunal found the Applicant&#039;s responses satisfactory, citing a previous judgment allowing a similar reduction. The order detailed the refund process to shareholders and compliance undertakings, requiring submission to the Registrar of Companies and publication in a designated newspaper.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400064</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>