https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400061 The Court considered the urgency of the situation and the impending expiration of the limitation period for filing an appeal before the CESTAT. It acknowledged the complexities of the case and directed that no coercive recovery steps should be taken until the next hearing date, allowing the applicants time to address the legal proceedings effectively. The Court balanced the need for timely action with the preservation of legal avenues for the applicants, ensuring their rights were safeguarded during the interim period. en-us Wed, 21 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Oct 2020 10:55:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400061 The Court considered the urgency of the situation and the impending expiration of the limitation period for filing an appeal before the CESTAT. It acknowledged the complexities of the case and directed that no coercive recovery steps should be taken until the next hearing date, allowing the applicants time to address the legal proceedings effectively. The Court balanced the need for timely action with the preservation of legal avenues for the applicants, ensuring their rights were safeguarded during the interim period. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 21 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400061