<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 1474 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291062</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected HDFC Bank&#039;s application to replace the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) with a new Resolution Professional (RP) due to the absence of a specific resolution by the Committee of Creditors (COC) approving the replacement. The judgment highlighted the importance of COC decisions in appointing or replacing Resolution Professionals under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, emphasizing the necessity of a majority vote to confirm such appointments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2020 10:28:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=626213" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 1474 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291062</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected HDFC Bank&#039;s application to replace the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) with a new Resolution Professional (RP) due to the absence of a specific resolution by the Committee of Creditors (COC) approving the replacement. The judgment highlighted the importance of COC decisions in appointing or replacing Resolution Professionals under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, emphasizing the necessity of a majority vote to confirm such appointments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291062</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>