<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 1412 - APPELLATE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, CHHATTISGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291054</link>
    <description>The Appellate Authority affirmed the decision of the Advance Ruling Authority, ruling that the appellant is not entitled to Input Tax Credit (ITC) on the design, supply, and erection of the lighting system for the plant road, boundary wall, and watchtower. The activities were deemed part of a works contract for immovable property, making them ineligible for ITC under Section 17(5) of the CGST Act, 2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2022 12:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=626190" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 1412 - APPELLATE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, CHHATTISGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291054</link>
      <description>The Appellate Authority affirmed the decision of the Advance Ruling Authority, ruling that the appellant is not entitled to Input Tax Credit (ITC) on the design, supply, and erection of the lighting system for the plant road, boundary wall, and watchtower. The activities were deemed part of a works contract for immovable property, making them ineligible for ITC under Section 17(5) of the CGST Act, 2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291054</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>