https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291033 A valid exemption notification identified Bhagavathi Valli with sufficient certainty, taking her outside Part IV of the Travancore Ezhava Regulation. As a result, succession to her property was governed by Marumakkathayam law rather than the statutory succession scheme. On that footing, the appellant could not trace title through persons competent to convey jenmom rights, so no valid title was established for redemption of the otti. The appeal therefore failed because the exemption was proved and the claimed redemption right was unsupported by title. en-us Wed, 08 May 1963 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Oct 2020 14:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291033 A valid exemption notification identified Bhagavathi Valli with sufficient certainty, taking her outside Part IV of the Travancore Ezhava Regulation. As a result, succession to her property was governed by Marumakkathayam law rather than the statutory succession scheme. On that footing, the appellant could not trace title through persons competent to convey jenmom rights, so no valid title was established for redemption of the otti. The appeal therefore failed because the exemption was proved and the claimed redemption right was unsupported by title. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 08 May 1963 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291033