<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1955 (6) TMI 15 - Calcutta High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291032</link>
    <description>A summary dismissal of an appeal without hearing the appellant offended natural justice, because an appellate process ordinarily requires a hearing before a party is non-suited; however, supervisory interference was unwarranted since no failure of justice was shown and the substantive result was correct. On statutory construction, a reference in the West Bengal Non-Agricultural Tenancy Act, 1949 to &quot;Calcutta&quot; defined by the Calcutta Municipal Act, 1923 continued to operate after repeal and re-enactment of that Act, because section 608 of the Calcutta Municipal Act, 1951 required existing references to be read as references to corresponding provisions of the new Act unless a different intention appeared. The challenge therefore failed and the land fell within the excluded area.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 1955 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2020 13:45:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=626176" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1955 (6) TMI 15 - Calcutta High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291032</link>
      <description>A summary dismissal of an appeal without hearing the appellant offended natural justice, because an appellate process ordinarily requires a hearing before a party is non-suited; however, supervisory interference was unwarranted since no failure of justice was shown and the substantive result was correct. On statutory construction, a reference in the West Bengal Non-Agricultural Tenancy Act, 1949 to &quot;Calcutta&quot; defined by the Calcutta Municipal Act, 1923 continued to operate after repeal and re-enactment of that Act, because section 608 of the Calcutta Municipal Act, 1951 required existing references to be read as references to corresponding provisions of the new Act unless a different intention appeared. The challenge therefore failed and the land fell within the excluded area.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 1955 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291032</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>