<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 1023 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400049</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, and the late fee levied under section 234E of the Income Tax Act was directed to be deleted. The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer could not charge fees under section 234E for defaults before 1.06.2015, as the amendment to section 200A(1) was prospective in nature. The Tribunal&#039;s decision aligned with previous judgments and clarified the Assessing Officer&#039;s power to levy fees under section 234E only after the specified date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2020 12:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=626162" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 1023 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400049</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, and the late fee levied under section 234E of the Income Tax Act was directed to be deleted. The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer could not charge fees under section 234E for defaults before 1.06.2015, as the amendment to section 200A(1) was prospective in nature. The Tribunal&#039;s decision aligned with previous judgments and clarified the Assessing Officer&#039;s power to levy fees under section 234E only after the specified date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400049</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>