https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291029 A jute-trade delivery order expressed in favour of the buyer's principals or order was treated as transferable by endorsement and as a document of title, so the transferee could acquire rights in the goods described. The seller's representation that payment had been made, coupled with its allowing the delivery order to be dealt with for value in the ordinary course of trade, precluded it from later denying payment, asserting an unpaid-seller's lien, or arguing that the goods were unascertained. The court also relied on the seller's failure to disprove appropriation, a matter specially within its knowledge. The plaintiffs' title and rights were therefore upheld. en-us Tue, 26 Jul 1910 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Oct 2020 12:17:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291029 A jute-trade delivery order expressed in favour of the buyer's principals or order was treated as transferable by endorsement and as a document of title, so the transferee could acquire rights in the goods described. The seller's representation that payment had been made, coupled with its allowing the delivery order to be dealt with for value in the ordinary course of trade, precluded it from later denying payment, asserting an unpaid-seller's lien, or arguing that the goods were unascertained. The court also relied on the seller's failure to disprove appropriation, a matter specially within its knowledge. The plaintiffs' title and rights were therefore upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 26 Jul 1910 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291029