<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 1008 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400034</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeals, directing the AO to add 12.5% of the total amount of bogus purchases and deleting other additions upheld by the CIT(A). It emphasized that the AO cannot conduct fishing inquiries during reassessment and confirmed that additions must align with the reasons recorded for issuing notice under section 148.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2020 11:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=626141" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 1008 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400034</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeals, directing the AO to add 12.5% of the total amount of bogus purchases and deleting other additions upheld by the CIT(A). It emphasized that the AO cannot conduct fishing inquiries during reassessment and confirmed that additions must align with the reasons recorded for issuing notice under section 148.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400034</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>