<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 1004 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400030</link>
    <description>The appeal was barred by the National Litigation Policy monetary threshold because the disputed amount was below the prescribed limit in the Board&#039;s 22 August 2019 instruction. As the departmental appeal did not meet the minimum monetary threshold for further litigation, it could not be pursued by the revenue and was dismissed as not maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2020 10:42:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=626135" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 1004 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400030</link>
      <description>The appeal was barred by the National Litigation Policy monetary threshold because the disputed amount was below the prescribed limit in the Board&#039;s 22 August 2019 instruction. As the departmental appeal did not meet the minimum monetary threshold for further litigation, it could not be pursued by the revenue and was dismissed as not maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=400030</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>