<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1922 (12) TMI 2 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291025</link>
    <description>The court found that there was no valid separation in the joint family estate as the alleged separation was not established. Regarding the properties acquired from the income of the impartible estate, the court held that such properties do not automatically accrete to the original estate but remain the absolute property of the estate owner. The judgment clarified the legal principles governing these issues and partially favored the appellant&#039;s claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 1922 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2020 10:20:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=626132" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1922 (12) TMI 2 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291025</link>
      <description>The court found that there was no valid separation in the joint family estate as the alleged separation was not established. Regarding the properties acquired from the income of the impartible estate, the court held that such properties do not automatically accrete to the original estate but remain the absolute property of the estate owner. The judgment clarified the legal principles governing these issues and partially favored the appellant&#039;s claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 1922 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291025</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>