<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 970 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399996</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the Writ Petition, directing a fresh review of the amendment request based on the presented contemporaneous evidence. The revenue was instructed to assess the submitted documents for their contemporaneous nature and make a decision within six weeks. No costs were awarded in the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 May 2021 11:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=626081" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 970 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399996</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the Writ Petition, directing a fresh review of the amendment request based on the presented contemporaneous evidence. The revenue was instructed to assess the submitted documents for their contemporaneous nature and make a decision within six weeks. No costs were awarded in the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399996</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>