<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 963 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, KOCHI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399989</link>
    <description>The application for initiating Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the Corporate Debtor was admitted by the Tribunal. A moratorium was declared, prohibiting various actions against the Corporate Debtor. The Tribunal appointed an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) to oversee the proceedings. The application was found valid, and the debt was categorized as a &quot;Financial Debt.&quot; Guarantors were impleaded, with their assets deemed outside the moratorium&#039;s scope. The Corporate Debtor&#039;s contentions were dismissed, and the Financial Creditor&#039;s evidence of default was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2020 18:18:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=626074" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 963 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, KOCHI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399989</link>
      <description>The application for initiating Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the Corporate Debtor was admitted by the Tribunal. A moratorium was declared, prohibiting various actions against the Corporate Debtor. The Tribunal appointed an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) to oversee the proceedings. The application was found valid, and the debt was categorized as a &quot;Financial Debt.&quot; Guarantors were impleaded, with their assets deemed outside the moratorium&#039;s scope. The Corporate Debtor&#039;s contentions were dismissed, and the Financial Creditor&#039;s evidence of default was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399989</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>