<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 956 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399982</link>
    <description>Retrospective exemption certificates issued under the entry tax exemption scheme must be given full effect for the entire covered period, including reassessment years, when the certificates expressly extend to that period. The tax authorities cannot confine the benefit to selected assessment years once retrospective exemption has been granted. Consequential relief may not be refused on technical limitation grounds where the exemption certificate was issued later, sufficient cause exists for seeking reassessment, and the statutory scheme permits revisional or related corrective powers. The availability of an alternative statutory remedy does not justify inaction where the certificate stands valid and has not been withdrawn or shown to be wrongly issued.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2021 13:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=626063" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 956 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399982</link>
      <description>Retrospective exemption certificates issued under the entry tax exemption scheme must be given full effect for the entire covered period, including reassessment years, when the certificates expressly extend to that period. The tax authorities cannot confine the benefit to selected assessment years once retrospective exemption has been granted. Consequential relief may not be refused on technical limitation grounds where the exemption certificate was issued later, sufficient cause exists for seeking reassessment, and the statutory scheme permits revisional or related corrective powers. The availability of an alternative statutory remedy does not justify inaction where the certificate stands valid and has not been withdrawn or shown to be wrongly issued.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=399982</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>