https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291016 The appeals filed by the appellant were rejected, and the impugned orders passed by the adjudicating authority were upheld. The rejection was based on the appellant's failure to comply with the procedural requirements under Rule 89(4A) and 89(4B) of the CGST Rules, 2017, and non-adherence to the procedures prescribed under Section 87 of the CGST Act, 2017, and Rule 41 of the CGST Rules, 2017 following the amalgamation of the appellant company. en-us Fri, 10 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Mar 2025 11:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291016 The appeals filed by the appellant were rejected, and the impugned orders passed by the adjudicating authority were upheld. The rejection was based on the appellant's failure to comply with the procedural requirements under Rule 89(4A) and 89(4B) of the CGST Rules, 2017, and non-adherence to the procedures prescribed under Section 87 of the CGST Act, 2017, and Rule 41 of the CGST Rules, 2017 following the amalgamation of the appellant company. Case-Laws GST Fri, 10 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291016