https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291003 The judgment upheld the seizure of goods and penalties imposed on the transporter and driver for discrepancies in the E-way Bill, intentional GST evasion, and violations of specific sections of the CGST Act 2017. Despite the appellant's challenges, including invoking Section 129(5) for conclusion of proceedings upon payment, the penalties were upheld based on detailed findings and corroborative evidence supporting the authority's decision. The appeal was rejected, emphasizing the importance of adhering to legal provisions and the significance of corroborative evidence in such cases. en-us Thu, 16 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Mar 2025 11:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291003 The judgment upheld the seizure of goods and penalties imposed on the transporter and driver for discrepancies in the E-way Bill, intentional GST evasion, and violations of specific sections of the CGST Act 2017. Despite the appellant's challenges, including invoking Section 129(5) for conclusion of proceedings upon payment, the penalties were upheld based on detailed findings and corroborative evidence supporting the authority's decision. The appeal was rejected, emphasizing the importance of adhering to legal provisions and the significance of corroborative evidence in such cases. Case-Laws GST Thu, 16 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=291003