https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290998 Guarantors facing revenue recovery were considered entitled to the same protection previously granted to another guarantor: proceedings against movable assets were to remain in abeyance and could continue only if other assets proved insufficient to satisfy the dues. The Kerala High Court applied that earlier protective direction to the petitioners, finding the benefit equally available to them in the recovery action initiated at the instance of the first respondent. en-us Tue, 20 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 24 Oct 2020 10:39:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290998 Guarantors facing revenue recovery were considered entitled to the same protection previously granted to another guarantor: proceedings against movable assets were to remain in abeyance and could continue only if other assets proved insufficient to satisfy the dues. The Kerala High Court applied that earlier protective direction to the petitioners, finding the benefit equally available to them in the recovery action initiated at the instance of the first respondent. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 20 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290998